An Ongoing Battle
Because following another account on Twitter is something you must do with intent, we don't see the same kind of spam normally associated with email—namely, lots of unsolicited Twitter updates in your timeline. However, Twitter has grown popular and thus attracted those who would try to manipulate various features to redirect traffic or gain some other advantage.We are actively engaged in working to defeat the variety of spam that has made its way to Twitter. The main motivation for spammy behavior on Twitter seems to be the usual: driving web traffic to another site. Some account owners will serially create many accounts and then post thousands of links. Others have only one account but still go crazy posting links—usually to the same web site and often in a way that attempts to trick people into clicking.
A Different Scale
Posting links to Twitter is great and we encourage people to do so. However, spammers are posting links on a whole different scale and they're doing something else we call Aggressive Following. This behavior entails following thousands of other accounts in the hope of reciprocation and it really peeves Twitter users because many of us are sensitive to our Follower count—we don't want email notifications triggered by spammers and we don't want to see our avatar on their profile page.
Those who have created thousands of accounts, posted thousands of the same link, or aggressively followed way too many people, stand out like a sore thumb to our support team because they are usually blocked by hundreds or thousands of well behaved Twitter users. This simple feedback is one of the ways we detect and delete spam accounts but there are also preventative measures and more we could be doing.
Pattern Recognition
By the time spammers show up internally on our blocked list, they've already upset plenty of folks. To deal with spam earlier, we monitor emerging patterns and react with preventative measures. To combat aggressive following directly we have recently imposed new limits on following—spammy accounts following too many users have been drastically curbed. Those that existed prior to this new limit await review. Our administrative tools for finding and dealing with spam grow more sophisticated as we learn more.
The Fight Continues
One thing's for sure, spammers will keep trying to spam. Part of our work will be to keep iterating and evolving our approach to spam so we can provide a good experience on Twitter. Our team has recently expanded to include a Chief Scientist with a keen interest in this area. We just wanted to make sure everyone knows that maintaining a low spam ratio is definitely part of overall service quality.

65 Comments:
I offer my help. Seriously.
~Ed
Yay!!! Way to go Twitter folks!! :)
It would be nice if the interface made it easier to block people. Right now I have to page through my followers to get to the block link, confirm, and then I'm directed back to the offender's page . . . it is really a PITA to audit my followers.
If we could block from our followers list without navigating off the followers list: yay!
Thanks for working on this!
Cheers,
-danny
You guys are GREAT for taking this on. It can't be easy with the success that TWITTER has achieved. I will keep blocking the blatent spammers, to try to help. Complaining about it isn't going to help, but if we can help let us know how!
Thank you SO much for finally starting to take real action. I hate how every single time i tweet, i get an email or two a few seconds later from twitter saying that someone has followed me. and from looking at the username, i can usually tell that its spam- having 20 new followers a day, all with a female name and/or some provocative words in the user just doesn't seem right. It is really very annoying, and up until now i have just ignored it. I will from now on block each and every spammer i come accross.
You also need to do something about the security of the public timeline. The only reason I'm getting these followers the second after i tweet is because there are bots patroling the public timeline, and following me as soon as my tweet shows up! I would just go private, so that they don't show up there, but i also want to be open, and not be so closed to the real people who want to know me on twitter. I'm all for the community- thats why I'm still on twitter- and community what most of twitters competitors lack. I think that you guys should add an option to remove your tweets from the public timeline without haveing to make your profile and previous tweets hidden from everyone exect your friends.
@mbalara had a great idea regarding the use of a hashtag whenever you get a spam follower. For example, the tweet would be:
"@neville9670 #twitspam"
Anyone who's using Twhirl, or one of the other well-developed interfaces, can aggressively block the aggressive spam followers right from their desktop.
It's a cool way to fight back, and much more feasible than leafing through your followers on the actual Twitter site and blocking them there.
@dannyman - I have tweeted about that same thing. I second confirmed blocking integrated within the same page.
Has a ceiling of 2,554 seriously been installed for all users? (i.e http://twitter.com/CreativeSage/statuses/864577634) Permanently??
I am happy for the go get them attitude, but what about us regular users? I am not at the point of the above said twitter user, but if I were to get there , as my blogosphere continues to grow, I would like to be able to reciprocally follow as many users as I wanted. (over time NOT all at once).
Twitter is more community oriented than ever. There are many users whom I have never met, and would hate to be limited.
What about having a "trial period" for twitter users? Your system could monitor an account and determine by a set of guidelines (marked by previous spammers & blocking behaviors / follow to follower ratio) whether this person is legitimate? Once it has been established the user is NOT a spammer then you could mark a user as "verified", this would also help other twitter users. You could even limit the email notifications that followed users receive to only those users that are verified. Thus saving a headache for verified users. Once a user is officially verified the follower alerts could be then sent out. And those who are deemed spam would be deleted.
-->Thanks for addressing the spam issues. Hopefully there can be a good solution for both twitter and twitter users.
Once again guys, thanks for listening to the community.
Yes spam is an issue, my blog gets hit each week no matter what I do...
Keep 'em honest Twit! In the beginning I couldn't conceive of ever using this type of forum but I've grown to LOVE it! I sometimes have the kids sitting behind me egging me on to use every single one of the 140 spaces! Now I'll be more conscious of when I tweet who suddenly wants to be my follower :) and block their butts!!
I think it's great that you are aware of the problem. However, I'm afraid that limiting the number of followed people initially will just lead to the spawning of many sock-puppets who each of them follow just a small number. :( Frankly, I don't know if this battle can be won. Spammers can always emulate normal users (even to the point of building friendship networks) and then begin to follow people.
Perhaps you can join forces with Craigslist, they have similar problems... :)
I am generally not a fan of playing "whack-a-mole" with spammers, but as I said in this tweet: http://tinyurl.com/5ud9xh
I think it would be safe to just go ahead and automatically ban anyone posting links to www dot the 6 figure team dot com in their profile or a single post. I don't know...I'm just guessing it would help your server load.
Thanks so much for acknowledging and addressing it. I know it won't be easy, but those of us who love Twitter will help in any way we can. Let us be your eyes and ears somehow.
Cheers,
Connie
@conniecrosby
Seriously, glad i saw this, i am not a heavy user, but started noticing the following emails from randoms today and it was seriously upsetting me. Till you figure this out can you stop the auto emails from followers.
Yes, hunt them down! Show no mercey
I know this dramatically increases the complexity of Twitter, and might therefore impact on performance, but how about a points/credit system, where you can follow certain amount of people when you sign up (20-50 should get you started with your circle of friends) then the more you post updates, and the more people reply to you and follow you, you gain the ability to follow more people. Blocks would count negatively towards your points score.
It would kill the "follow thousands but only post one update" spammers stone dead, while adapting to the usage of regular Twitterers.
It would also encourage spammers to post more often, but as the number of updates is only one component of the points score, and blocks count negatively, it should help manage the problem.
I'd say there's a lot you could do to speed up the process of blocking a spammy follower - at the moment, I click the link in my email saying someone is following me, then I have to go to a separate page listing all of my followers, click through the pagination until I find the new person, then press block, then confirm that YES I REALLY DO KNOW WHAT BLOCKING MEANS, then finally I'm done... Would be much nicer if straight from the first link I could click 'block' and be done.
Hello Everyone here , i am new with twitter i hope i can maximize the capabalities of Twitter thanks :)
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Free idea for Twitter. Up to 1-200 "Following" is free. After X amount of Following, you pay. That would cut out most annoying marketers.
http://twitter.com/livingfrisbee/statuses/842736960
I second dannyman's comment. A great first step would include a better UX for mass-deleting spam-bots.
I'd like to see two columns of all my followers as well as their follow/friend ratio. And then a nice little check-box so I can mass select them and purge.
Way to go!
It's funny that I read this now because I am like half way done writing a web app to do this. It handles new follower notifications and gives you a digest of new followers over a given period of time so you can decide if this new follower is someone you want to block, ignore, or follow back. My only concern with my service was API rate limits, but it's been working for just me.
@andy - if you have a public twitter account you can block a person from their profile page rather than having to search through your whole list. The block option is under the photos of people they are following.
@james spada - you can stop the new follower notices by going to Settings from the menu bar at top, and then selecting the Notices tab. Your various options are there.
I'd noticed the drop-off in recent spam-followers and had wondered if Twitter had done some magic. Well done.
I appreciate your will to take action against spammers. I want to second the request of commenter #3: Make blocking people that follow you easier. Ajaxify the blocking options in the followers list, put people that haven't yet been followed on top, maybe integrate an additional button "mark as spammer" (for me twittering 99% in German, it's easy to see that someone is following me just for spamming reasons, so I'd "clean up" my list regularly). I think the follow/block ratio could be a good indicator for you to identify spammers.
Keep it up, guys.
I'd love it if i could filter my followers by the number of people they follow. i would do a batch delete of people who are following more than 1,000. surely they can't be interested in anything I'm tweeting about if they're following so many!
I think a large number of people just want to sell stuff. Commonly known as spammer but in reality, a large percent of people using any new media is looking for ways to make money. This is not necessarily bad because if everyone is buying from everyone else, everyone wins. However, blatant spam is annoying.
Take woot.com for example. If I got on their twitter, all they're doing is selling stuff to twitter users. Would you call that spam? Well?
I'm very glad to see this issue being taken seriously! It's something I've been thinking about quite a bit lately and blogged about it myself only a couple of days before this post here.
> To combat aggressive following directly we have recently imposed new limits on following—spammy accounts following too many users have been drastically curbed.
While I fully understand and approve of the desire to get rid of spammers (spitters?) we need to be very very sure these limitations do not adversely affect the experience for "real" regular users of Twitter. Unfortunately, they ARE affecting those users.
I was at the Tweetup in HalfMoon Bay tis evening and spoke to several people - real, live people with followers because they have something to say. These are people who want to follow back. Their follower/folowee ratio approaches 1.
They were all confused, upswet, and frustrated because, todfay, they tried to follow someone back and couldn't.
So, while I approve the idea, in principle, the implementation needs a lot of adjustment. Now. Before the bad press hits.
Hi all,
I'm new here.
It didn't say if the post took so I will try agian.
Glad you are addressing this.
My big issue is the spam follow email - they're getting out of control, where I really have to start asking, is Twitter worth it? I don't want to turn off email notifications, because the real ones are very, very useful. But getting to my email in the morning to find that "cellphonedeals" or "superweightloss" are following me is just very irritating.
A daily digest of new follows would be an improvement. So would some kind of trial period with account penalities for excessive blocking.
I don't think blocking someone who follows a lot without being followed is the answer, because there are certainly people who want to follow a lot of others but might not post much or follow much on their own - sort of Twitter wallflowers, like people who read lots of blogs but don't comment much, etc.
There are a lot of creative thoughts about this from users, as you can see in this comment thread; I urge you to consider the ideas and do so quickly, because it's becoming a real problem.
Thanks! I'm already seeing a difference.
I agree with Vicky Brown. By limiting the number of followers, now rumored to be set at 2500, you're punishing people who have an almost equal followers/follow ratio.
Essentially these are the people who have made Twitter as popular as it is to day. Sounds to me like you're going to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
In my opinion it is impossible to "spam" Twitter because I can CHOOSE to not follow or block those that abuse the service. Actually, blocking the "spam bots" is what I've been doing.
If enough of us did that, instead of being concerned about the "prestige" that having a large amount of followers showing on your profile page gives to your "social reputation", we wouldn't need to have Twitter take care of it for us.
Sharon McPherson
@SharonMcP
Easy way to deal w/ so called "spam" (i.e. email notifications of people who are following you.
1) If you don't want to get an email every time someone wants to follow you - you can easily turn your email notifications OFF
2) Twitter limiting the amount of people you can follow is the EXACT reason people do NOT like Facebook and came over to Twitter as their favorite social network.
Twitter will NEVER go "mainstream" as many in the tech community have been trying to do if Twitter places numerical limits on how many people you can LISTEN to. sillyness
3) JetBlue is not the only "company" suffering. Our software system Blog i360 has thousands of people using the system that we want to follow back and limiting our ability to do that will turn us to the open source community that will create a TWitter killer, like Identi.ca
4) I have close to 4K who follow me, and I've closely reviewed EVERY page of my followers and contribute / engage in the conversation - they're not spam bots. Why should I now be restricted and not able to follow them back?
I write a new media marketing column for Entrepreneur Magazine and other newspapers - and being able to follow - AKA: "Listen" to many people in the TWitterverse, helps me predict trends, see what the marketplace is interested in, focused on and talking about - thereby helping me write a relevant column that helps others reading the magazines/newspapers I write for.
5) Why not just get rid of the REAL robots like that little kid who follows 51 people yet followed by close to 7,000 because he's got robots out there spamming you until you DO follow him - or BLOCK him as I have done & many others because he is a perfect example of how Twitter is being exploited by a BOT - not a real person - like myself who contributes to blogs, and other's Twitterstream.
6) I'm publishing a book w/ Warren Whitlock on How To Use Twitter for business - and if you restrict my ability to follow the people who follow me, you turn ME into someone who is only able to talk AT people and not WITH my followers!
It makes NO sense to restrict your ability to follow or be followed based on arbitrary "numbers". Silliness.
Create something effective that's REAL, and TWitter will stay around for the long haul.
But what's currently in place - is HORRIBLE & restricting the ability to interact with REAL people. :(((
Coach Deb
Deborah Micek
Author of the
http://TwitterHandbook.com
Blog:
http://TribalSeduction.com
Sharon, most people are blocking what they perceive as spam accounts. It becomes a pain, though, when you get 10-20 requests to follow a day, and most of them are spammy. It is a lot of work to look through them and block. Multiply that by all of us, and that is a lot of wasted effort. Better to find a way to flag it early and save the rest of us all the work.
Please correct this ASAP.
I need to follow back a client of mine trying to send me direct messages, and it seems like I"m "ignoring" them by your restriction of me being able to follow more people.
Arbitrary numbers don't work!
Check out the Summize stream for "CoachDeb" and you'll see how many people tweet that I offer VALUE & contribute.
This is NOT cool!
People who don't like me don't have to follow me. But I need to follow my friends, contacts and clients BACK when they want to talk to me privately so we don't clog up the twitterstream.
@CoachDeb
I'm glad to see Twitter is trying to fight spam, but I was very unhappy a few days ago when abruptly, without warning, I was suddenly unable to follow ANYONE back, including legitimate business contacts and friends who have added me recently after we met in person or communicated online in some valid way.
Additionally, today, immediately after I tweeted about my inability to follow any more people, my followers were abruptly cut by about 1000—surely, not all of those people are "spammers," and I would prefer it if I had the ability to decide who was cut, and which ones were spammers.
In either case above, we should have been warned. I've attended a number of "TweetUps" and other events recently where those people have added me, and I have been unable to add them back, which would seem rude to them, so I've had to announce this problem so they would understand. Also, if I can't follow someone legitimate, or if they've been cut abruptly, I cannot to business with them on Twitter or follow up a message they sent me earlier without having to find their phone no., email, etc.
Please give your users adequate warning before doing taking steps like this, and I also think there should be a better interface for seeing who your followers/friends are and being able to add or remove them more quickly. It takes too long right now.
How can I continue to recommend Twitter to corporate business clients if they encounter these same issues? I am trying to support Twitter as a vital business tool, but the Twitter staff needs to look at their actions from the viewpoint of users, especially those of us who are in a position to recommend Twitter to corporate clients, business partners, and valued friends.
I hope my ability to follow, send DMs, re-gain valued followers and discern them from spammers is returned/upgraded ASAP. Twitter staff, are you listening to your clients?
Cathryn Hrudicka/CreativeSage
Please let us know what has happened. People now following around 1/3 less...and those weren't spam accounts (who follows spam accounts?).
You've got a lot of angry people in Twittertown right now. Not upset, but angry. Take the pulse yourself.
Where have all my followers and followees gone? I've been on Twitter for 18 months. I've carefully added people over that time. More people have added me. And suddenly half of each are gone. Including people I've conversed with daily. I've put up with everything that's happened here, defended Twitter all that time. But now I'm angry as hell. Twitter is pretty much the only social life I have.All that time, all that effort invested and now what?
Well that's just dandy, but it seems that in the process of purging spammers, you purged a large chunk of genuine relationships. ...living breathing people that I've been communicating with. *sigh*
i would prefer to delete people permanently instead of just blocking them.
You nailed some innocents this time, Twitter...alas! MMJ
Hmmm!!!
I only started using Twitter in the past few days and most certainly had not indulged in "spam". This morning I wondered why I was now only following one person instead of three as of last night.
Then I saw a note saying that one of the people I'd been following had his followers cut from 702 to 92. That's rather drastic.
I hope Twitter is not going to become a arrogant as Google in its treatment of users. If so, I'll have to revise my initial congratulatory comments about it.
- David -
Hmmm!!!
I only started using Twitter in the past few days, and certainly have not indulged in "spam" of any kind.
However, last night I was following three people. This morning I found only one left.
One of the people I was following has had his followers cut down from over 700 to 92! Presumably I'm one of the axed group.
There's a danger here of the Twitter-police coming to be seen as approaching the Google standard of arrogance. Don't go down that road. You'll destroy what you've got.
- David Murray -
I agree with @SharonMcP
Antispam measures should be considered, but any automated process will see legitimate users impacted in some way, even if it's the really rare person who has just joined and wants to use Twitter as a way to get input from 1000 people without having the confidence to contribute.
More needs to be made of our ability as Twitter users to be able to block people who we judge as spam, and not simply rely on follow ratios etc.
@badgergravling
Good it is. So for I had not been spammed. Controlling spam will be a real time help.
It's nice to know my blocking spammy followers has helped Twitter get rid of some of these annoying users. And to think, someone was flipping me shit a few weeks ago for "micromanaging" my followers list by blocking those...
kopper
I think some babies may been tossed out with the bathwater. I and a number of the folks I Twit with were shocked yesterday when half our following/follower list vanished. I block spammers pretty agressively, and I don't follow spammers (with the exception of Scoble ;-p).
Well, it seems you went to far. Way too far. I am new and was following about 40 people and was being followed by about a dozen. As of today, no followed and no followers. I've been Twittering because people I respect told me that I would come to understand the value once I've done it for a while. For a casual user, this kind of clumsy and ill-considered interference outweighs all the benefits of the service. I will give it another try but if this is your idea of helpful, I won't last another round.
Been watching with interest as you guys fight "Tweet Fraud". As a Twitter fan and fellow spam fighter, let me know if we can help. After all, generating what could become bogus ad impressions or activity is bad for business.
Perhaps expand the API to include spam reporting? At http://twitturls.com the majority of the code we write is detecting and deleting spam from the incoming timeline. These usernames and links go into a blacklisted table, it would easy to implement the next step, twitter report.
You need to consider a one-time message to all new users---or something---to let people know to check http://status.twitter.com/. And you need to update that site. You can't say "Even after this recovery is complete" without a couple of posts saying "still working on it ... still working on it ... done!"
on a related note can we start a poll on renaming "followers"?
I like:
twlock
twaggle
twride
twack
twarm
twerd
Anyone else think the cat is "powncing" on the dog?
does anyone know how to get to the section of the site for consumer complaints I am new to twitter I saw this on the TV
There is no specific area for consumer complaints. The ABC program refers to people generally complaining to all their followers about a product or service. If the company is paying attention to conversations on Twitter, they will hopefully respond.
I think the point of the program was that smart companies will pay attention to conversations on the Internet. But, this is not necessarily a direct route to getting heard as a consumer.
Does this help?
Cheers,
Connie
First, yay Twitter! And thanks! There is nothing more annoying than seeing you are being followed by someone who is also following 56,000 other people. Seriously, how do they find me?
Second, perhaps there would be a way of reporting these offenders which could eventually result in cancellation?
It's definitely not a perfect solution but maybe could trigger an idea to lead to something.
Thanks for being on it.
Yes. Twitter had increased its visitor traffic these days and constantly improving. I hope i can be part of success of twitter. I post links but i dont post them like crazy gaining traffic to my site. I post just for my identification and hope my avid readers understand it.
Thank you
Charles
Money Making and Blogging Tips
thanks twitter i work for zoogatv a popular entertainment video clip portal and i had been hearing about you guys. my first day as a registered user and so far loving it.
Not sure if anyone has mentioned this idea yet (no time to read all the replies, sadly), but how about decoupling "private" and "requires acceptance for new followers"?
I periodically put my profile to "private" when the spammers get too much, to make it easier to turn them off. But I don't really want to hide my notifications, because I suspect many people will use my notifications to verify that I am, in fact, a human.
In other words, by making my tweets private I'm *removing* a tool for *others* to determine if I am a spammer.
Seems kinda hypocritical of me to use other people's tweets to determine if they are spammers, but not allow my own to be used..
Alternatively, you might allow temporary access to a person's tweets if they choose to follow a person. Facebook uses this model: if I choose to make a friend request, my profile is visible to the target of the request, so that they can verify me.
Hi,
Twitter is a free social networking service where they allows users to send updates which are text-based. It is also known as "tweets". it means that when you send a message to anybody then you will receive quickly.
Twitter is more community oriented than ever. There are many users whom I have never met, and would hate to be limited.
Rony
===================================
widecircles
Hey folks, you've gone too far. You have accidentally suspended my account (and some of my friends' too!). I am one of Twitter's biggest supporters. You gave me no notice.
Help,please?
I don't attract much attention as few of my friends are on Twitter. However when someone is following 165,228 people it's more of a gimmick to get people to look at his "new social network" than because he wants to make new friends.
I applaud your efforts to rid Twitter of spammers but must agree that applying an arbitrary following/follower ratio penalizes legitimate business people who are not spammers. Many trend followers (writers, speakers, coaches, researchers) may cast a broad net and follow many to stay "tuned in" to conversations and are not spammers. While I personally do not have 1000s of followers, I also don't want to be limited to an arbitrary number as my business and influence grows. I would much rather see the community do its own policing with tools that facilitate one click blocking of unwanted followers. The beauty of Twitter for me has been our individual ability to choose whom to follow. I would ask that you reconsider the "aggressive following" policy and instead create a much easier blocking mechanism.
I'm with Karen Swim on this, I'm one such blogger who casts a wide net, and is being penalized for it. Something needs to be done, before many twitter supporters just leave altogether.
Post a Comment
<< Home